跳至主內容 Skip to main content

What Happens to Members Who Lie to Withdraw MPF Early?

2011-03-11
Marcus Tang

What MPF offences were prosecuted in March 2011?

On 14 March 2011, member Cheung Kai-tak was convicted at Kwun Tong Magistrates’ Courts under MPF Ordinance s.43E(1) and fined HK$6,000 for false and misleading statements claiming permanent departure. The same day, two employers were convicted: Kwok Pui-man of Pui Ying Beauty Trading was fined HK$48,000 for failing to enrol staff and defaulting contributions; Chu Yan-tak of Tak Shing Auto Body Works was fined HK$41,000 for multiple defaults. The Small Claims Tribunal also ordered Ka Wai Food to pay a HK$5,000 default surcharge.

How hard are defaulting employers hit?

Prosecution and fines apply, plus the MPFA recovers arrears and surcharges; offenders are named on the MPFA’s public defaulting-employers register.

How can employees protect themselves?

Check annual benefit statements to confirm timely contributions; report suspected defaults to the MPFA hotline 2918 0102. Contribution rules are on the MPFA website; fund choices at MPF fund comparison.

    Related articles

    False Declarations for Early MPF Withdrawal: 4 Convicted, Fined HK$24,000; 8 Employers Fined HK$491,000

    Four MPF members who applied for early withdrawal on “permanent...

    Defaulting on MPF Contributions Can Mean Jail: First Director Jailed for 21 Days

    Defaulting on MPF contributions is a criminal offence. Under the law, an...

    MPFA sues to recover HK$2,884 in MPF arrears

    This article is a rewrite of a report from August 2013. The MPFA took...

    funds to compare