This article is a rewrite of a report from July 2012.
Under the law then in force, 65 was the statutory age for withdrawing MPF accrued benefits. But members who reached 65 with ample reserves and no urgent need for the money could leave their benefits in a personal (preserved) account to keep compounding — extending the investment horizon to lift return potential.
Members could withdraw at 65; if they didn’t apply, trustees would write within 12 months of their 65th birthday asking whether to withdraw or retain. Critically, the choice was all-or-nothing: a single lump-sum withdrawal or full retention for continued investment — no partial withdrawals. The decision hinged on personal needs and finances at the time.
Holders of self-employed or preserved accounts could stay with the existing scheme or move their benefits to another one. Fees shouldn’t be the only criterion — service quality and infrastructure mattered too, such as face-to-face service centres for older members, and financially strong trustees with resources to train specialists and expand services.
No. Conservative is not risk-free, and retirees who kept benefits invested still needed to review their portfolios regularly. The two regular documents from trustees — the Fund Fact Sheet and the Annual Benefit Statement — showed what the portfolio held and how it performed, guiding any adjustments.

Job-hoppers easily lose track of how many MPF accounts they hold. The MPFA...

In July 2011 the MPFA revealed it was studying two relaxations to MPF...
Amid Hong Kong’s emigration wave, “permanent departure”...