A 2 March 2011 Ming Pao editorial: with a bumper harvest (HK$93.8 billion surplus, HK$600 billion-plus reserves), John Tsang could have won applause — instead his “candies” sparked fury. Citizens resented the HK$6,000 MPF injection instead of tax rebates most; with a 6 March march looming, the government should soften its stance.
The money was locked till retirement — distant water for a present fire; rebates would have helped now. Tsang first insisted the budget couldn’t change, then promised improvements — contradicting himself.
No rebates were just the spark; the real cause was misguided property policy inflating home prices. The administration needed to find what lay behind the anger, not just hand out sweets.
Mixed feelings — but MPF is your money either way. Tend it: compare MPF funds.

Why did a 2011 commentary propose “paying contributions” over...

What were the key MPF developments in May 2011? May 2011 brought four big...