In May 2011, a commentator urged the government to admit the Tracker Fund of Hong Kong — the passive Hang Seng Index tracker — into MPF, giving every account holder a low-fee, higher-return option. The author had proposed one-off MPF injections instead of tax rebates since 2007, and saw MPF’s low returns and high fees as a key reason the injection policy failed — problems needing a thorough fix.
Nearly every active fund can present itself as beating rivals, yet after high fees their actual results often trail the index; cheap passive index funds tend to do better over time. Members choosing now can find low-fee, steady performers at MPF fund comparison.
The author doubted competition alone would help: choosing funds is hard, and active funds’ fees devour returns. He also proposed encouraging voluntary top-ups with matching tax allowances — but only after fixing low returns and high fees first.
In 2017, the 49 Hong Kong equity MPF funds averaged a return of nearly 40...

This was an English-language commentary published in the Hong Kong Economic...
MPF Ratings data shows AIA Eurasia Fund delivers 23.69% one-year return and...