跳至主內容 Skip to main content

Why Bring the Tracker Fund Into MPF?

2011-05-14
Marcus Tang

Who proposed including the Tracker Fund in 2011?

In May 2011, a commentator urged the government to admit the Tracker Fund of Hong Kong — the passive Hang Seng Index tracker — into MPF, giving every account holder a low-fee, higher-return option. The author had proposed one-off MPF injections instead of tax rebates since 2007, and saw MPF’s low returns and high fees as a key reason the injection policy failed — problems needing a thorough fix.

Why do passive funds win?

Nearly every active fund can present itself as beating rivals, yet after high fees their actual results often trail the index; cheap passive index funds tend to do better over time. Members choosing now can find low-fee, steady performers at MPF fund comparison.

Would semi-portability alone fix things?

The author doubted competition alone would help: choosing funds is hard, and active funds’ fees devour returns. He also proposed encouraging voluntary top-ups with matching tax allowances — but only after fixing low returns and high fees first.

    Related articles

    The tragedy of 33 per cent: Hong Kong equity MPF’s 2017 winners and losers

    In 2017, the 49 Hong Kong equity MPF funds averaged a return of nearly 40...

    Bond yields down from 10% to 1%: how global pensions turned fee cuts into returns

    This was an English-language commentary published in the Hong Kong Economic...

    AIA Eurasia Fund Leads Peers with 23.69% One-Year Return

    MPF Ratings data shows AIA Eurasia Fund delivers 23.69% one-year return and...

    funds to compare