This is a rewrite of a report from March 2012; the original was a short fund-knowledge column.
FER comes up constantly in MPF discussions — what does it actually mean? The fund expense ratio is a fund’s total expenses as a percentage of its assets. In plain terms: how many per cent of your money the fund costs each year.
| Included in FER | Not included in FER |
|---|---|
| Fund management fees | Transaction fees deducted directly from member accounts |
| Operating costs such as trustee and audit fees | |
| Guarantee fees on guaranteed funds | |
| Underlying fund charges when investing in other funds |
FER captures the fund-level expenses as a share of assets, but excludes charges you pay directly, such as transaction fees taken from your account. It is the handiest single number for comparing fund costs — but it is not the whole cost picture.
Because fees eat directly into your net return, and FER is the simplest way to compare costs across funds. Note that published fund returns are already net of the charges inside FER. When choosing, use the MPFA’s fee comparison platform to line up FERs of similar funds, then weigh risk and track record alongside — don’t pick on price alone.
As the Legislative Council debated a motion to abolish the MPF offsetting...

Why did 2011 experts say FER is the best fee yardstick? In 2011, advisers...

Some employees believe you get what you pay for — that a pricier fund is...