跳至主內容 Skip to main content

What is the MPF fund expense ratio? A quick guide to MPF fund fees comparison

2012-03-27
Marcus Tang

This is a rewrite of a report from March 2012; the original was a short fund-knowledge column.

FER comes up constantly in MPF discussions — what does it actually mean? The fund expense ratio is a fund’s total expenses as a percentage of its assets. In plain terms: how many per cent of your money the fund costs each year.

What goes into the MPF fund expense ratio?

Included in FERNot included in FER
Fund management feesTransaction fees deducted directly from member accounts
Operating costs such as trustee and audit fees
Guarantee fees on guaranteed funds
Underlying fund charges when investing in other funds

FER captures the fund-level expenses as a share of assets, but excludes charges you pay directly, such as transaction fees taken from your account. It is the handiest single number for comparing fund costs — but it is not the whole cost picture.

Why does FER matter so much?

Because fees eat directly into your net return, and FER is the simplest way to compare costs across funds. Note that published fund returns are already net of the charges inside FER. When choosing, use the MPFA’s fee comparison platform to line up FERs of similar funds, then weigh risk and track record alongside — don’t pick on price alone.

    Related articles

    Government defends MPF’s 16-year record ahead of offsetting debate: 3.2 million covered, fees down over 25%

    As the Legislative Council debated a motion to abolish the MPF offsetting...

    How Do You Compare MPF Fees?

    Why did 2011 experts say FER is the best fee yardstick? In 2011, advisers...

    Expensive MPF funds don’t deliver better returns, MPFA study finds

    Some employees believe you get what you pay for — that a pricier fund is...

    funds to compare