In January 2011, a TV current-affairs programme marked ten years of MPF by asking whether the scheme could really protect members’ retirement. Two good years of returns did not settle it: inflation eroded purchasing power, returns were never guaranteed positive, and lengthening life expectancy meant a bigger pot was needed.
At the time, employers chose the MPF provider and workers had to follow. Guests on the show backed the “semi-portability” proposal letting employees pick their own provider, so competition could drive fees down. Job-hoppers with scattered preserved accounts were urged to consolidate them.
Compare MPF funds to see fees and performance across schemes before consolidating old accounts.

Job-hoppers easily forget how many MPF preserved accounts they hold. The...
In November 2017, an MPFA non-executive director appeared on a television...

This article is a rewrite of a report from August 2013. By Marcus Tang. The...