The Employee Choice Arrangement — MPF semi-portability — was due in 2011 but suddenly halted, dashing workers’ hopes. A survey found 63% say the MPF does nothing to ease retirement worries, and 40% back scrapping it — a vote of no confidence.
In 2004 workers found losses on their “capital preservation” fund statements — “preservation” that didn’t preserve. After misleading-name criticism, the MPFA took five years to act, renaming them “conservative funds” in October 2009.
Conservative and low-risk funds charge the most — some up to 4%, eating into contributions. Management fees long criticised as fattening MPF companies stay high; with employers choosing the trustee, employees can’t switch even when overcharged.
The MPFA says intermediary regulation must come first — earliest launch 2012. Semi-portability would have brought competition and pushed fees down by letting employees choose their own trustees. Deferred, workers keep paying fat fees.
How fat are MPF fees? Check expense ratios at MPF fund comparison.

This article is a rewrite of a report from August 2013. Read what an MPF...

This article is a rewrite of a report from August 2013. H1 2013 MPF returns...

Four MPF members who applied for early withdrawal on “permanent...