跳至主內容 Skip to main content

Picking MPF funds: don’t judge by management fees alone

2011-05-16
Marcus Tang

Many workers pick MPF funds by one number — the management fee. Cheapest wins. But judging by management fees alone can lead you astray.

Why aren’t management fees the whole story?

The fund expense ratio is the true cost. Management fees are only part of the bill — trustee, administration and audit fees all add up; the fund expense ratio (FER) captures the real total. Two funds can differ by 0.1 point on management fees but 0.5 points on FER — watching only the headline fee misses most of the cost.

What else matters?

Long-term performance is king. A cheap fund that persistently underperforms can cost you more in lost returns than you save in fees; a pricier fund that consistently outperforms compounds into a much bigger pot. Judge fees and performance together: FER for true cost, long-term annualised returns for real strength.

To compare fees and long-term performance side by side, see our MPF fund fees comparison at MPF fund comparison.

    Related articles

    Government defends MPF’s 16-year record ahead of offsetting debate: 3.2 million covered, fees down over 25%

    As the Legislative Council debated a motion to abolish the MPF offsetting...

    Expense ratios fell, but wallets still shrank: MPF per-capita costs up 65% in a decade

    In November 2017, the Federation of Trade Unions published research that...

    Sixteen years of the MPF: the pricier the fund, the worse the return

    Sixteen years ago today — 1 December 2000 — the Mandatory Provident Fund...

    funds to compare