跳至主內容 Skip to main content

MPF Is No Demon: Clearing Four Charges

2011-04-08
Marcus Tang

Is MPF really beyond redemption?

A columnist defends MPF: fees look high from start-up amortisation and small scale, with room to fall; low returns mostly reflect members’ own conservative picks lagging inflation, while equity and mixed funds delivered 9–10%; better to speed Employee Choice and force fee cuts through competition. Demonising solves nothing.

After the rant, what actually helps?

Stop shouting, start fixing the mix: the young shouldn’t sleep in capital-preservation funds — go bolder to beat inflation. Compare equity vs preservation funds’ long-run returns and act instead of raging.

    Related articles

    Brent at $107 Meets a 5.4% 30-Year Yield: The Inflation-Tail Hedge Math for MPF Portfolios

    Brent at $107 Meets a 5.4% 30-Year Yield: The Inflation-Tail Hedge Math for MPF Portfolios

    Track 2 Tactical Allocator | 2026-09-25 | Lead Financial Strategist, mpf.hk...

    Same Returns, Different Retirement: The HK$310,000 Cost of Sequence Risk

    Same Returns, Different Retirement: The HK$310,000 Cost of Sequence Risk

    Track 3 Wealth Autonomy Academy | 2026-09-25 | Lead Financial Strategist,...

    funds to compare