跳至主內容 Skip to main content

How Did EY Propose Helping Low Earners via MPF Injection?

2011-02-16
Marcus Tang

What relief did EY propose in 2011?

In February 2011, EY proposed setting aside HK$17 billion for low-income earners, with HK$8.5 billion as a one-off HK$6,000 injection into the MPF accounts of workers earning under HK$10,000 a month. With treasury revenue far exceeding expectations, EY raised its full-year surplus forecast from HK$70 billion to HK$80 billion, arguing the windfall gave the government room to relieve hardship.

Why target low earners?

EY’s managing partner said government relief often missed the “three-nils” — no public housing, no tax paid, no CSSA received. A targeted MPF injection would help them fight inflation. Once credited, workers should pick funds suiting their risk appetite at MPF fund comparison.

What about the other HK$8.5 billion?

It would fund immediate cash assistance. The broader package also included public-housing rent waivers, rates waivers, electricity subsidies and higher dependent-parent tax allowances.

    Related articles

    Should the Government Inject Into MPF or Pay Contributions Instead?

    Why did a 2011 commentary propose “paying contributions” over...

    The Means-Tested Pension Option: Assets Over HK$80,000 and Middle-Class Elderly Get Nothing

    The Government’s Line: HK$80,000 Single, HK$125,000 Couples The...

    “Retirement Protection: Forging Ahead Together” Lands: Two HK$3,230 Options, Tenfold Cost Gap

    The Consultation Paper Tables Two Modelled Options After long deliberation,...

    funds to compare