In February 2011, EY proposed setting aside HK$17 billion for low-income earners, with HK$8.5 billion as a one-off HK$6,000 injection into the MPF accounts of workers earning under HK$10,000 a month. With treasury revenue far exceeding expectations, EY raised its full-year surplus forecast from HK$70 billion to HK$80 billion, arguing the windfall gave the government room to relieve hardship.
EY’s managing partner said government relief often missed the “three-nils” — no public housing, no tax paid, no CSSA received. A targeted MPF injection would help them fight inflation. Once credited, workers should pick funds suiting their risk appetite at MPF fund comparison.
It would fund immediate cash assistance. The broader package also included public-housing rent waivers, rates waivers, electricity subsidies and higher dependent-parent tax allowances.

Why did a 2011 commentary propose “paying contributions” over...

The Government’s Line: HK$80,000 Single, HK$125,000 Couples The...
The Consultation Paper Tables Two Modelled Options After long deliberation,...