This article is a rewrite of a report from July 2012.
Many members see the “MPF Conservative Fund” name and assume capital protection. The MPFA renamed it from “capital preservation fund” back in October 2009 — precisely because the old name misled. Conservative does not mean capital-protected. That is lesson one.
Because beyond Hong Kong-dollar deposits, these funds hold 40–60% in Hong Kong-dollar fixed-income bonds. Bond returns move with yields and prices; a bad stretch can leave returns below savings rates. Even matching savings rates, trustees still pay the 0.03% compensation-fund levy and professional indemnity insurance on net assets — waiving management fees does not equal capital protection.
Guaranteed funds do carry capital or return guarantees — with strings attached (lock-ins, limited guarantee periods, restricted withdrawal triggers). Conservative funds are merely low-volatility. Do not confuse the two.
Consider it only within five years of planned retirement. At end-March 2012, 11.7% of MPF assets (about HK$45.7 billion) sat in conservative funds, far above other money-market categories. But in high inflation its meagre returns may not keep up — the young who lean on it too hard risk watching inflation devour their balances. Before choosing, always read the fact sheet’s fee model and track record.
Parking MPF money in the “safest” option — conservative funds or...

This article is a rewrite of a report from August 2013. By Marcus Tang. MPF...

In November 2017, the MPFA published its latest MPF statistical digest, and...