High-fee MPF funds can devour your retirement savings. The Consumer Council’s survey of nearly 300 MPF funds found a few percentage points of fees can halve 40-year accrued benefits: at 1% annual fees, 40-year benefits fall 23% (about HK$690,000); raising fees from 1% to 3% cuts benefits 52% (about HK$1.58 million) — assuming 5% annual returns on HK$3.05 million of benefits.
| Item | Figure |
|---|---|
| Average FER (asset-weighted) | 2.06% (range 1.61%–2.52%) |
| Lowest FER | 0.41% (equity fund) |
| Highest FER | 3.87% (guaranteed fund) |
| Schemes above average | 21 of 35 (60%) |
| Guaranteed funds’ average FER | 2.53% (highest of all categories) |
Same-category fees can differ twofold: mixed-asset funds range from 1.38% to 2.84%.
The Fund Expense Ratio (FER) = a fund’s total actual expenses as a percentage of average net assets, calculated to the MPFA’s 2004 disclosure code — covering management, trustee, legal and audit fees. It’s deducted straight from fund assets; members rarely notice.
The Council reminds: beyond fees, weigh fund objectives, category, track record, trustee service levels and your own risk tolerance. Cheap but unsuitable is still wrong. Compare MPF funds’ fees and returns at MPF fund comparison.

Why did 2011 experts say FER is the best fee yardstick? In 2011, advisers...

In November 2017, the MPFA published its latest MPF statistical digest, and...

This article is a rewrite of a report from August 2013. With 550 MPF funds...