With the Employee Choice Arrangement due in the second half of 2012, BCT and Fidelity opened fire in a management-fee price war, with cuts reaching 20%. For BCT it was the third fee cut since MPF began — membership across its two schemes had grown markedly to 550,000, which the firm called the right moment to adjust charges again.
From 1 January 2012, 14 constituent funds across BCT’s master-trust and industry schemes drop management fees 2%–17%, with new fees between 0.99% and 1.725% — about 370,000 clients (nearly 70% of members) benefit immediately. Ka Shi Lau, BCT’s managing director and CEO, said the cut would sharpen competitiveness ahead of the ECA.
Fidelity’s cut took effect on Saturday 12 November, trimming 0.12–0.28 percentage points — equivalent to 7.6%–20.6%. 陸劍平, its Hong Kong head of institutional business, said the cut was not about poaching clients but about years of asset accumulation cheapening administration; he conceded next year’s ECA was also a factor.
The war worked on three levels: immediate giveback — 370,000 BCT members and 300,000 Fidelity clients better off at once; signalling — trustees telling the market that ECA competition had begun; and structure — asset growth diluting admin costs, giving the cuts fundamentals rather than pure promotion.
A third cut established a trend: BCT’s fees fall further each time, not as a one-off sweetener. Members should swap “how much did my fund cut?” for “where does my fund’s fee rank in its category?” — the question that actually matters in the ECA era. The MPF education hub shows how to compare.
In January 2018, the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority (MPFA)...

Sixteen years ago today — 1 December 2000 — the Mandatory Provident Fund...

This article is a rewrite of a report from August 2013. Eight-plus months...