A December 2010 commentary argued that with Hong Kong’s population ageing fast and retirement needs growing, the “MPF fees are too high” debate needs data, not slogans.
The elderly share is surging; the support ratio is sinking. Low birth rates and long lives mean a rising share of elderly and more seniors per working person — piling pressure on retirement systems.
Consider services, scale and international comparisons. The piece argued fee criticism should account for trustee services, Hong Kong’s small market spreading costs thin, and how fees compare elsewhere — not absolute numbers alone. That said, room for cuts is undeniable.
Pick low-fee funds; don’t be a sitting duck. Whatever the fair level, members should actively compare funds’ fees and performance and choose what’s right for them. Compare MPF funds’ fee levels at MPF fund comparison.

This article is a rewrite of a report from August 2013. With 550 MPF funds...
Hong Kong’s largest bank, HSBC, will cut the management fees charged...

MPF voluntary contributions rose to HK$16 billion in 2016, accounting for...