This article is a rewrite of a report from August 2012.
The November 2012 “MPF semi-free choice” was much discussed — but what made it only “semi”? The Employee Choice Arrangement gave employees one right: to move accrued benefits from their own mandatory contributions in the current contribution account to a chosen trustee and scheme, once per calendar year, in one lump sum.
Because the employer portion stays put. Employees could move only their own share; employer contributions remained in the original scheme — hence “semi”. Doing nothing and staying put was equally valid.
No one had to switch, and certainly not immediately. If the employer’s chosen scheme suited you, staying was fine. Before deciding, weigh:
| Factor | What to check |
|---|---|
| Fund choice | Range, features, risk levels; more choice isn’t always better, especially near retirement |
| Trustee service | Depth and clarity of information, channel convenience, annual fund-switching allowance |
| Fund fees | Compare like-for-like fees on the MPFA’s fee comparison platform |
| Personal factors | Investment goals, life stage, risk tolerance |
No. Moving benefits does not necessarily deliver better investment returns — think before acting. Remember: switching was a right, not an obligation.
Questions? Call the MPFA hotline on 2918 0102 or visit www.mpfa.org.hk.

The MPF Employee Choice Arrangement is imminent — workers will pick schemes...

This article is a rewrite of a report from August 2013. About nine months...

This article is a rewrite of a report from August 2013. The Employee Choice...