跳至主內容 Skip to main content

Why Does the MPF System Need Reform?

2011-07-11
Marcus Tang

What did a July 2011 commentary propose?

The MPFA was reportedly planning two strikes against high intermediary admin fees: tighter monitoring with disclosed fee breakdowns and MPFA-defined reasonable levels; and an MPFA-led public intermediary run like a non-profit social enterprise so citizens save on admin fees. It was also studying relaxed early withdrawals for doctor-certified serious illness, home purchase or children’s overseas study.

What are the system’s big problems?

Over-restrictive rules (nothing until 65), high fees, inadequate protection. After 11 years covering nearly 2.5 million workers with HK$300 billion-plus in assets, decade data still showed protection falling short.

What’s worth copying from Singapore?

Singapore’s CPF is far more flexible: beyond a reserved sum, the rest can go into approved stocks, funds, bonds, gold, life insurance — even property mortgages, helping push home ownership above 90%. Hong Kong could let employees use MPF more flexibly.

    Related articles

    Think twice before tapping MPF savings for a first home: what can HK$180,000 do against a HK$2 million down payment?

    The MPFA was studying whether to allow early MPF withdrawals for first-time...

    MPF withdrawal for home purchase should be deliberated

    The Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority (MPFA) was studying the...

    funds to compare