跳至主內容 Skip to main content

Why Did Protesters Demand Universal Retirement Protection?

2011-05-26
Marcus Tang

Why Did Protesters March on Government HQ for Universal Pensions?

On 26 May 2011, more than twenty members of the Alliance for Universal Pensions petitioned outside government headquarters while the Executive Council met, protesting Donald Tsang’s dismissal of universal retirement protection as “impractical”. They accused the government of ignoring elderly poverty and demanded a HK$50 billion seed fund to launch universal pensions.

Why did they say MPF was not enough?

Protesters argued MPF could not solve elderly poverty and that citizens needed basic retirement protection. MPF is compulsory saving plus investment — returns carry risk and low earners accumulate little; universal protection would guarantee everyone a basic pension regardless of contributions.

What was the HK$50 billion seed fund idea?

The alliance wanted the government to seed universal pensions with HK$50 billion. The government’s position then was that universal pensions were impractical and fiscally unsustainable.

What sits alongside MPF for retirement?

Voluntary contributions and private savings complement MPF. To grow your pot, compare MPF funds across the market.

    Related articles

    “Retirement Protection: Forging Ahead Together” Lands: Two HK$3,230 Options, Tenfold Cost Gap

    The Consultation Paper Tables Two Modelled Options After long deliberation,...

    The Means-Tested Pension Option: Assets Over HK$80,000 and Middle-Class Elderly Get Nothing

    The Government’s Line: HK$80,000 Single, HK$125,000 Couples The...

    funds to compare