What was the May 2011 march about?
In May 2011, the HKCTU mobilised a dozen women and children to march demanding universal retirement protection so housewives and part-time women workers would be covered in old age. Marching from Chater Garden to government headquarters under the banner “Recognise mum’s contribution — universal retirement protection now!”, the union cited Census data showing over 210,000 women earned under HK$5,000 a month in 2009 — nearly double the number of men.
Why doesn’t MPF protect these women?
Many married women gave up careers for family; even in part-time or casual work, employers need not contribute MPF for them. One courier said a former employer refused contributions, costing her tens of thousands — her MPF balance was just HK$50,000, leaving her anxious about retirement.
How does universal protection differ from MPF?
Universal retirement protection would cover everyone regardless of employment status; MPF covers only the employed. What workers can do now is choose better funds at MPF fund comparison and grow their own balances.
Related articles
View allUniversal pension backed by 90% of submissions but rejected: scholar warns against forcing a means-tested scheme
In November 2017, a professor emeritus of social work and social...
Using MPF to Buy Flats? Scholar: Average Balance Is Just HK$285,000 — Retirement Isn’t Ready, Don’t Put the Cart Before the Horse
“If MPF could help with a flat down payment, Hong Kong people would...
Lam calls MPF “unpopular with employees” as offsetting debate looms: can the core fund rebuild trust?
A report from November 2017 captured the speeches at the Global Forum on...