跳至主內容 Skip to main content

Why Did Full MPF Portability Need a Central Database First?

2011-07-23
Marcus Tang

What Did Anna Wu Propose?

MPFA chairwoman Anna Wu said “semi-portability” was only transitional — the long-term goal was “full portability,” letting employees move both their own and employers’ accrued benefits to a preferred trustee once a year. But the plan first required data on every member’s account, so the MPFA would study a “central database” for feasibility and cost-effectiveness.

What Was the Timetable?

“Semi-portability,” letting employees choose trustees for their own contributions, was hoped to pass LegCo before its term ended and launch next year. Full portability was a long-term goal bringing fundamental change, needing wide discussion — likely years away.

How Would the Offsetting Mechanism Be Handled?

Wu said offsetting was labour legislation, beyond the MPFA’s remit — for the government and policy bureaux to consider. For full portability, the MPFA needed a way to store all member account data so employers could trace where their contributions’ accrued benefits went.

    Related articles

    MPF “full portability” by 2016: MPFA annual report sets timetable

    This article is a rewrite of a report from August 2013. The MPFA’s...

    Offsetting to go, Cheung vows: government will do more to help SMEs through transition

    Chief Secretary for Administration Matthew Cheung has reaffirmed that the...

    Why Was Full MPF Portability So Hard?

    Why was “full portability” deemed difficult in November 2010? A...

    funds to compare