Singapore’s Central Provident Fund, set up by the colonial government in 1955, is the city-state’s mandatory savings plan covering housing, healthcare and retirement — fully funded, so payouts equal what you saved plus interest, with no cross-generation subsidy. At September 2002 it had 3.0 million account holders and S$95.4 billion in savings.
Three accounts: Ordinary (housing, investments, insurance, education), Special and Medisave. Each has its purpose — more flexible than MPF.
CPF is state-run with conservative investments and quarterly-set interest rates; MPF uses private trustees and market investments — more choice but higher fees and self-borne risk. CPF can also fund home purchases; MPF cannot.
Versatile uses and low charges are CPF’s strengths. Under Hong Kong’s system, workers’ best move is picking low-fee funds — compare them.

In the long run, employees and employers alike would rather the MPF did not...

Federation of Public Housing Estates asks the government to let first-time...
The MPFA was studying whether to allow early MPF withdrawals for first-time...