In early October 2011, short-selling turnover in Hong Kong stocks surged to more than HK$12 billion, and plenty of investors suspected the borrowed stock was coming from MPF funds. The MPFA moved quickly to ask every MPF trustee — and to clear the air.
When Hong Kong short-selling turnover surged in October 2011, investors suspected MPF funds were the source of borrowed stock. The MPFA proactively asked all MPF trustees and confirmed that no MPF company had recently lent stocks to investors engaged in short selling — MPF money was not the “ammunition” of the short sellers.
Under MPFA rules, MPF companies may lend stocks only if they meet a series of strict conditions:
| Rule | Detail |
|---|---|
| Collateral | Collateral worth 105% of the lent stock’s value |
| Daily adjustment | Revalued daily against the latest stock and collateral prices |
| Income | Lending income, after fees, goes to scheme members |
| Anonymity | No lending to anonymous investors |
In other words, even where lending happens, members’ interests must not suffer from it.
By mid-October, short-selling turnover had bounced back to HK$7.1 billion — still well below the HK$12 billion-plus of early October. A securities professionals’ association had written an open letter demanding tighter short-selling regulation, but the government said it had no plans to halt short selling for now, moving only to strengthen the disclosure regime.
More than two years after its launch, the Mainland-Hong Kong Mutual...

2017 was a bull-market year by any measure: US stocks hit record after...
In 2017, MPF funds averaged a return of about 20 per cent, with some...