This article is a rewrite of a report from January 2012.
More than two million employees were counting down to November 2012, when the Employee Choice Arrangement — “semi-portability” — would let workers transfer their own MPF contributions once a year. The government was rushing legislation to regulate MPF intermediaries, but the Hong Kong Trustees’ Association warned that officials had never consulted the industry on a sales code for frontline staff, leaving three big questions unanswered and the trade fearing it could not meet the new requirements in time.
The industry’s biggest worry was the missing detail on sales conduct. Even though the MPFA would take charge of regulating intermediaries, officials had not consulted on whether sales standards would be uniform across intermediaries, whether bank- or insurer-style practices applied, or whether trustees must stop members switching into funds that mismatched their risk profile — leaving the trade with no answers.
The association’s newly appointed chairwoman, who also headed its retirement schemes committee, laid out the three grey areas in an interview:
Time was brutally short: even if the Legislative Council passed the intermediary bill before the summer recess, the market would have only three months to implement the Employee Choice Arrangement. The MPF education hub explains how the system works.
Why did insurance brokers oppose the 2011 government plan? In 2011, the Hong...
How did the 2011 government tighten intermediary oversight? In 2011, the...
(Editor’s note: this report was originally in English and is rewritten...