After nearly a decade at work, one Hong Kong blogger had never paid attention to his MPF — until a flat move unearthed years of MPF letters. Sorting through several accounts covering ten years, he found his pot had grown just over ten per cent in total: positive after fees, but far too small, he felt, to retire on. His story captures a familiar 2012 predicament.
MPF is a long-term investment, but long-term does not mean unattended. As of April 2012, the average MPF expense ratio in Hong Kong was 1.74 per cent a year — over a decade, that compounds into a heavy drag; and many workers left old accounts scattered across job changes, parked in conservative funds whose returns trailed inflation. Neglect, fragmentation and fees are the usual suspects behind a decade of single-digit growth.
MPFA figures put preserved accounts — old accounts left behind after job switches — at 4.035 million at end-March 2012, or about 1.5 per worker across Hong Kong’s 2.576 million employees and self-employed persons. One survey found nearly half of respondents had never consolidated theirs. Scattered accounts, zero attention and high fees: the blogger’s tidy-up turned up all three.
Ten per cent in ten years is less an indictment of MPF than of neglect. Sometimes it takes a flat move — and a pile of old letters — to discover how scattered a retirement pot has become.
In January 2018, the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority (MPFA)...
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury James Lau told the...
In November 2017, an MPFA non-executive director appeared on a television...