This article is a rewrite of a report from October 2012.
Two days before semi-portability, a Consumer Council report warned: “low-risk” MPF guarantee funds charged an average 2.24% — up to 3.86%, the priciest of all fund types — yet returned -0.14% over five years. Experts added: transferring benefits can void the guarantee period.
2.24% on average, 3.86% at most — the highest of any category. But pricey didn’t mean profitable: five-year returns were -0.14% while other categories stayed positive. Guarantee funds promise capital or interest-rate guarantees while still investing in stocks and bonds; the guarantee itself adds extra operating costs, forcing conservative positioning.
The guarantee term tracks bond maturities. AMTD’s Kenny Tang explained: guarantee periods follow five- or ten-year bond terms, with principal returned only at maturity. Leaving early means selling at market prices — losses possible. Some plans state outright: fund switches or trustee transfers void the guarantee. Before switching, get the guarantee terms from your original trustee in writing.
Two-thirds isn’t the fund manager. HKIFA chief Sally Wong said trust, administration and management eat two-thirds of fund charges; the manager takes the rest. She expected semi-portability’s competition to add downward pressure.
“Low risk” never meant “can’t lose”. In 2012 guarantee funds charged the most, delivered negative returns, and switching voided the guarantee — the year’s most ironic lesson. Before picking one, ask: what are the guarantee conditions? Does switching keep it?

The MPF Employee Choice Arrangement is imminent — workers will pick schemes...

Job-hoppers easily forget how many MPF preserved accounts they hold. The...

This article is a rewrite of a report from August 2013. By Marcus Tang. Hong...