This article is a rewrite of a report from September 2012.
The MPFA board passed two major proposals for the government to legislate (no timetable then):
After a three-and-a-half-month public consultation drawing 287 submissions, the proposal was: anyone reaching retirement age or qualifying for early withdrawal could choose a lump sum or phased drawdown of all MPF benefits. The authority could set minimum and maximum frequencies and minimum amounts per withdrawal to keep payouts reasonable and administration simple.
Two-thirds of consultation respondents agreed members and trustees should agree the arrangement between themselves, with the law setting only minimum standards via the authority.
A disease endangering life and reducing life expectancy to 12 months or less. Members needed a certificate from one registered doctor or registered Chinese medicine practitioner, issued no more than 12 months before the claim.
The authority said the one-year certification followed Australian practice. Some medical professionals worried about liability if the prognosis proved wrong; the authority promised guidance on certification criteria — based on reasonable evidence, with just one registered doctor’s signature required.
Both proposals won about 90% support in consultation. A union called the measures welcome but urged the government to study universal retirement protection; a labour-sector lawmaker and a union executive called the proposals reasonable and pressed for swift legislation.
The injustice being fixed: some terminally ill contributors could die without ever qualifying to touch their MPF.

In July 2011 the MPFA revealed it was studying two relaxations to MPF...
MPFA reviewing long-term MPF contribution rates, considering gradual...
MPFA reports surge in fake MPF ads on social media promising early...