This article is a rewrite of a report from February 2012.
During the 2012 chief-executive race, one candidate floated a bold idea: the Exchange Fund makes big money almost every year, yet citizens see none of it. Why not open voluntary-contribution accounts, managed free by the HKMA, and pay dividends to all when times are good? Economists pushed back immediately.
A chief-executive candidate’s 2012 economic platform proposed voluntary MPF accounts managed and invested by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority free of charge, with dividends paid to all MPF account holders when Exchange Fund returns or public finances were strong. Accounts could be opened for HK$100, covering housewives and the “N-nothing” class; contributions were voluntary and withdrawable at any time. The camp stressed it was about encouraging saving, not handouts — the dividend threshold was left to public debate.
A Chinese University economist backed the savings-account idea as extra choice for the public but opposed paying dividends from the Exchange Fund, whose purpose is defending the linked exchange rate with capital preservation — not making money for citizens. He warned dividends could push fund managers toward unnecessary risk and create annual political pressure for payouts. The Exchange Fund then stood at HK$2.95 trillion (2012 figure).
Mandatory contributions are fixed by law at 5% each from employer and employee and locked in until 65; voluntary contributions are flexible extra savings — withdrawable at any time under this proposal. The camp distinguished it from injecting money into MPF: only after the Exchange Fund earned past a certain level would surpluses flow into general revenue for possible dividends, not paid out directly by the HKMA. More on how voluntary top-ups work in the MPF education guides.
In November 2017, a political party proposed a Central Provident Fund to...
A report from November 2017 captured the speeches at the Global Forum on...

MPF voluntary contributions rose to HK$16 billion in 2016, accounting for...