跳至主內容 Skip to main content

MPF May Loosen Early Withdrawals: Critical Illness, Home Deposits, Children’s Overseas Study

2011-07-14
Marcus Tang

A decade into the MPF, sources say the MPFA’s review report due in the second half will study loosening early withdrawals: critical illness, home down payments, children’s overseas education and the like could unlock contributions before 65. But the stance is “tight rather than loose” — no flimsy excuses, no taking everything at once.

Current rules vs what’s studied

ItemCurrentUnder study
Pre-65 accessAge 60, permanent emigration, total incapacity, death, small balancesAdd: critical illness (no longer life-threatening only), home deposits, children’s study etc.
Withdrawal cap—A percentage only; no lump-sum-in-full
Post-65Hard stop at 65Deferrable past 70; instalments possible (e.g. over 30 years)
Appeals—Appeal mechanism + more vetting staff studied

Two views

Chow Wing-sun (ex-MPF advisory chair): the idea is years old, modelled on Singapore; but average balances are only ~HK$200,000 — hardly worth taking. Better to wait until balances reach HK$400,000–500,000.

Kwong Cheuk-chiu (economist): backs more flexibility with rigour — e.g. allow over-40s (that age brings illness and school-age children); the very young have no case.

Loosening is compassion; strictness is principle. Where the line falls is the second-half report’s headline act. Compare MPF funds’ fees and returns at MPF fund comparison.

    Related articles

    Why Would Early MPF Withdrawals Kill Retirement Protection?

    Why did a 2011 commentary oppose easing early MPF withdrawals? A 2011...

    MPFA Studies Early MPF Withdrawal for Serious Illness, Phased Payouts After 65

    In July 2011 the MPFA revealed it was studying two relaxations to MPF...

    86 per cent of members made no fund switches in five years: how bad is Hong Kong’s MPF inertia?

    From April 2017, all MPF schemes were required to offer a Default Investment...

    funds to compare