跳至主內容 Skip to main content

MPF fund fees comparison: expense ratios can differ by 4 percentage points

2011-08-06
Marcus Tang

Semi-portability, originally due this April, was shelved to tighten intermediary regulation. The MPFA has consulted on the fix, including an electronic platform; if the bill passes in Q4, semi-portability could launch in H2 next year — the industry expects September next year at the earliest.

How wide are MPF fee gaps?

Across MPF’s six fund categories, annual fund expense ratios can differ by 2 to 4 percentage points. Will semi-portability trigger a trustee price war? Hong Kong Trustees’ Association vice-chairman Lau Kar-shi says each trustee has its own sales strategy — fee cuts or new fund launches; cheaper new products like ETFs will multiply next year.

Why was it shelved?

Towers Watson Hong Kong chief Cho Wai-bong says the halt was to stop overly aggressive intermediary sales tactics, hence the need for legislation. The regulatory bill is largely shaped; only enactment remains. Semi-portability benefits everyone and the bill is uncontroversial — expect a smooth H2 2012 launch after LegCo passage.

How are the supporting arrangements coming?

The MPFA is building a personal account registry and an electronic transfer system so trustees can process benefit transfers online. Lau argues semi-portability need not wait for the platform; the 1–3 month handover mainly gives intermediaries preparation and investor-education time, pointing to a Q4 launch after legislation.

To compare fund expense ratios, visit MPF fund comparison.

    Related articles

    Are Firms Liable When MPF Intermediaries Misbehave?

    How did the 2011 government tighten intermediary oversight? In 2011, the...

    BCT’s Lau Ka-shi: no surge in Employee Choice Arrangement switching expected

    This article is a rewrite of a report from August 2013. Eight-plus months...

    funds to compare