As 2011 drew to a close and the Employee Choice Arrangement (“semi-portability”) was expected by end-2012, whether MPF fees would fall further became the hottest topic at the “MPF Forum 2011”. Executives from AIA and Bank Consortium Trust both said management fees had room to fall — but warned against a vicious price war, insisting service quality was the real battleground.
MPF fees still had room to fall, because once “semi-portability” took effect, employees could choose their own trustees — forcing providers to compete on fees and service. At the December 2011 forum, AIA and Bank Consortium Trust executives both expected management fees to keep falling, while stressing it should be healthy competition: lower fees, but no lower service quality.
| Trustee | View on fees | Readiness for semi-portability |
|---|---|---|
| AIA | Management fees still have room to fall; more low-fee products coming | Members should look beyond fees at service and fund choice |
| Bank Consortium Trust | Fees will keep falling; no vicious price war | Operations and IT systems ready; no chaos expected |
| Sun Life | — | No industry mergers expected within five years |
The fee debate was heated partly because 2011 was a miserable year. Consultant Gain Miles noted that in the first 11 months of 2011, all equity funds lost money, with Greater China equity funds down more than 22.58% — the worst performers. Cumulative average returns since MPF’s launch had fallen from 33.91% at end-2010 to 20.47% by end-November 2011. Talking about fees in a losing year naturally stung more.
Details of the Employee Choice Arrangement are covered in guides at the MPF education hub.

This article is a rewrite of a report from August 2013. Eight-plus months...

How did voluntary contributions save on fees in 2011? A 2011 report noted...

What did a 2011 scholar propose for MPF “bank-accountisation”?...