跳至主內容 Skip to main content

MPF at Ten: LegCo Demands Full Review as Lawmakers Slam Fees Eating Contributions

2010-12-03
Marcus Tang

LegCo passed a non-binding motion urging a full review of the MPF system. Lawmakers blasted its flaws: sky-high fees devouring contributions, HK$13.7 billion offset over a decade, and a 5% contribution rate that can’t fund retirement.

Three salvos

CriticismNumbers
Fees too highIntermediary management fees average 1.89%, up to 3.92%; on HK$10,000 monthly pay, HK$120,000 contributed over 10 years — guaranteed funds showed the highest headline returns but earned the least in reality. Fees are the culprit
HK$13.7b offsetHK$13.765 billion offset over 10 years, 4% of HK$340b+ total assets; over HK$2.5b offset yearly
5% isn’t enoughLow earners can’t save enough; Lee Cheuk-yan wants government contributions for them

HSBC cuts first, but incentives weak

Market leader HSBC launched the city’s cheapest product, potentially triggering cuts; but with semi-portability delayed, trustees have little incentive to follow. Even MPFA chair Anna Wu says fees must fall further and faster.

Chan Ka-keung’s response

The treasury chief cited HK$345.7 billion accumulated for nearly 2.5 million people, 5.1% average returns net of fees beating inflation; the system has room for improvement and stays under review. Offsetting, he said, was a labour-business compromise of its day — change needs consensus.

HK$13.7 billion offset in ten years is no small change. Workers’ retirement money shouldn’t be a severance-pay ATM. Compare MPF funds’ fees and returns at MPF fund comparison.

    Related articles

    How Did K C Chan Judge MPF’s First Decade?

    What did K C Chan say about MPF’s ten years in 2010? In December 2010,...

    The “Ten Sins” of MPF: Unions List a Decade of Failings

    As MPF turned ten in December 2010, unions and advocacy groups marked the...

    funds to compare