LegCo passed a non-binding motion urging a full review of the MPF system. Lawmakers blasted its flaws: sky-high fees devouring contributions, HK$13.7 billion offset over a decade, and a 5% contribution rate that can’t fund retirement.
| Criticism | Numbers |
|---|---|
| Fees too high | Intermediary management fees average 1.89%, up to 3.92%; on HK$10,000 monthly pay, HK$120,000 contributed over 10 years — guaranteed funds showed the highest headline returns but earned the least in reality. Fees are the culprit |
| HK$13.7b offset | HK$13.765 billion offset over 10 years, 4% of HK$340b+ total assets; over HK$2.5b offset yearly |
| 5% isn’t enough | Low earners can’t save enough; Lee Cheuk-yan wants government contributions for them |
Market leader HSBC launched the city’s cheapest product, potentially triggering cuts; but with semi-portability delayed, trustees have little incentive to follow. Even MPFA chair Anna Wu says fees must fall further and faster.
The treasury chief cited HK$345.7 billion accumulated for nearly 2.5 million people, 5.1% average returns net of fees beating inflation; the system has room for improvement and stays under review. Offsetting, he said, was a labour-business compromise of its day — change needs consensus.
HK$13.7 billion offset in ten years is no small change. Workers’ retirement money shouldn’t be a severance-pay ATM. Compare MPF funds’ fees and returns at MPF fund comparison.

What did K C Chan say about MPF’s ten years in 2010? In December 2010,...

As MPF turned ten in December 2010, unions and advocacy groups marked the...
In November 2017, an MPFA non-executive director appeared on a television...