MPF turns ten: joy for some, gloom for others. The cheerleaders point to record assets and a maturing system; the critics cite high fees, patchy returns and thin protection — and calls to scrap MPF are sounding again.
Scrapping it only brings more problems. MPF has real flaws, but abolition isn’t the answer: without the mandatory-contribution pillar, Hong Kong would lack even the most basic retirement-savings mechanism, and elderly poverty would only worsen. Rather than tearing it down, the pragmatic path is fixing the pain points one by one — squeezing management fees, widening investment choice, relaxing withdrawal rules, and strengthening protection for low earners.
By Lee Siu-bor, Director of the Economic Research Centre, CUHK Asia-Pacific Institute
To see the current system’s fund choices, visit MPF fund comparison.
The Most Important Question Goes Unasked The government has claimed for...
The MPF has run since 2000, and the law lets employers dip into the...