A decade into the MPF, many still ask: contributions are so small — is it enough? Cheng Kim-wai says answering requires understanding why the government created it: it was never meant to fund your whole retirement. It’s one of three pillars.
A 1994 World Bank report advised countries to do three things:
| Pillar | Content |
|---|---|
| First pillar | Tax-funded public welfare safety net |
| Second pillar | Private mandatory pension system (the MPF) |
| Third pillar | Personal savings and insurance |
The MPF is only the second pillar. Alone, it cannot fully protect you. A comfortable retirement still needs personal savings and investment “ammunition”.
| Year | Share of population 65+ |
|---|---|
| Now | 13% |
| 2039 (projected) | 28% |
First-ever income band adjustment: minimum HK$5,000→6,500 (effective this November), maximum HK$20,000→25,000 (under review, expected next June) — those earning HK$20,000–25,000 will contribute more; the personal contribution tax allowance may rise from HK$12,000 to HK$15,000.
Is the contribution rate enough? At 5%, Hong Kong trails many countries at 10%+. Should it follow Australia in raising rates gradually, or push personal savings harder? More next time.
Rather than asking if the MPF is enough, ask whether your three pillars are built. Compare MPF funds’ fees and returns at MPF fund comparison.
In November 2017, a political party proposed a Central Provident Fund to...

To live the retirement of their dreams, Hongkongers say they must first save...
A report from November 2017 captured the speeches at the Global Forum on...