Adapted from reporting originally published in March 2012.
2011’s market turmoil dented MPF returns; the early-2012 rebound repaired them. The lesson drawn at the time was timeless: how does MPF work best? As a long-horizon platform for practising asset allocation — spreading money systematically across equities, bonds and cash to match age, time horizon and risk tolerance.
Look beyond age to life stage, family and career circumstances. A single thirty-something earning HK$25,000 a month can stomach more risk than a same-aged peer with two young children. Higher risk tolerance points toward equity funds; lower tolerance toward bond or conservative funds. Time is the allocator’s ally — the longer the horizon, the better it absorbs short-term swings.
| Risk tolerance | Equity funds | Bond / conservative funds | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Higher | Larger share | Smaller share | Young, single, no dependants |
| Lower | Smaller share | Larger share | Married, children, mortgage pressure |
Review the portfolio every six to twelve months and rebalance back to target weights. If life hasn’t materially changed, the job is simply rebalancing — trimming whatever has run ahead, such as equities after a strong year. Avoid frequent switching on short-term market moves: panic selling locks in losses and can mean missing the rebound.
MPF’s monthly contributions and lock-in until 65 naturally suit dollar-cost averaging and long-term investing. Buying a fixed amount each month — fewer units when prices rise, more when they fall — smooths the average cost. The technique isn’t reserved for fund managers; with the basics, any member can apply it. An insurer’s distribution chief made the case in a 2012 column.
Global equities have climbed sharply, with Hong Kong and US stocks setting...

Should MPF money be allowed to buy more A-shares? In August 2017, reports...

This article is a rewrite of a report from August 2013. By Marcus Tang. MPF...