跳至主內容 Skip to main content

How do workers see MPF after the crash? Three mindsets

2011-09-01
Marcus Tang

After August’s mini-crash, three workers shared their views on MPF — three ages, three mindsets.

Safety first: Mr Tsang

“This retirement money is for old age — I dare not be aggressive!” Nearly 90% of Mr Tsang’s money sits in conservative funds: “Last month’s crash barely touched our MPF!” Near retirement, capital preservation comes first.

Gains and losses don’t matter: Ms Yip

“I’ve got ten or twenty years before touching MPF — gains and losses now mean nothing. I’ll keep choosing high-risk portfolios!” Youth is capital; time smooths volatility.

Volatility expected: Gary

“I chose high risk myself — no pain, no gain! And I’ve got twenty, thirty years to retirement!”

Which mindset fits you?

No absolute answer — only what fits your life stage. MPF’s golden rule: the young can be aggressive, the older should be conservative; the worst is following the herd — panic-switching to conservative in crashes, chasing risk in rallies. Knowing your own risk tolerance is step one. Explore funds by risk level with MPF fund search.

    Related articles

    Choosing an MPF fund? Start with yourself: three questions every member should ask

    Choosing a Mandatory Provident Fund should start with you — not with...

    Conservative Funds Return at Most 1.2% a Year — All Trailing 1.8% Inflation

    Parking MPF money in the “safest” option — conservative funds or...

    The 80 per cent idle: the retirement blind spot BlackRock found

    For decades, global asset prices soared in multiples, and the generation...

    funds to compare