This article is a rewrite of a report from June 2012.
With MPF semi-portability expected in November 2012, workers would soon be able to move the employee-contribution portion to providers of their choice. Hong Kong providers and intermediaries were already preparing: some built fund-performance platforms, others stepped up education.
A pensions group managing director said the clearest effect would be more competition, but fees shouldn’t top the checklist — fund performance mattered most. A pricier fund that still outperformed after fees was worth choosing; a cheap but poor performer was not. Average MPF fees then ran about 1.7 per cent. She noted providers each excelled in different fund categories — none did everything well — so investors had to choose case by case.
No. A financial services executive said many assumed online switches traded instantly at current prices, when the switch price was actually the unit price one to two business days later — a sign of how shallow public fund knowledge was, and why her firm was pushing education, even sending promotional vans into neighbourhoods.
The MPFA’s platform showed fees but not performance; one provider had set up a free platform with performance data and comparisons, and planned new MPF products before the launch. Employers were watching too: one firm offered employer clients an online platform comparing ORSO and MPF performance to help them choose — since forfeited ORSO benefits of short-tenure leavers belonged to employers, they wanted to choose wisely.
One reminder: under the Employee Choice Arrangement, members could switch providers only once a year — choose wrong, and there was no redo for 12 months.
Hong Kong workers hold an average of 2.3 MPF accounts — consolidation can...

This article is a rewrite of a report from August 2013. Beyond MPF, Hong...
A buoyant stock market lifted MPF returns through the year. The MPFA...