跳至主內容 Skip to main content

Full MPF portability: MPFA studied long-term support as employers loomed as the biggest obstacle

2011-10-14
Marcus Tang

The 2011 Policy Address mentioned full MPF portability for the first time — letting members freely move both employer and employee contributions between trustees. The MPFA said it was studying long-term supporting measures, but a non-executive director admitted this revolutionary change would take at least a decade, with employers as the biggest obstacle.

What is full MPF portability?

Full MPF portability lets scheme members transfer all employer and employee contributions to a trustee of their choice, with complete freedom over their MPF scheme; by contrast, “semi-portability” (the Employee Choice Arrangement) only lets employees move their own current-employment contributions at least once a year. MPFA chairman Anna Wu once called full portability “the next decade’s plan”; the authority said it was too early to say when it would come.

Semi-portability (ECA)Full portability
Transferable contributionsEmployee’s current-employment contributionsAll employer and employee contributions
Target launchSecond half of 2012A decade away (2011 estimate)
Expected coverage~67% of contributions freely transferableAll contributions

Why are employers the biggest obstacle?

The crux is offsetting: full portability requires first scrapping the current arrangement allowing MPF to offset long-service or severance payments. MPFA non-executive director Wong Kwok-kin supported full portability — after all, the employer’s 5% belongs to the employee — but said resistance was strong: employers feared money would follow employees out, making contributions hard to trace, and feared complications for offsetting long-service payments when dismissing staff.

The MPFA’s three-pronged response

The Policy Address also published MPF’s report card: nearly 85% of the workforce had retirement protection since launch, with average annual returns of 5.1% after fees (as of 2011). The MPFA planned three supporting moves: promoting market competition so greater employee choice would drive fees down; studying supporting measures for full portability; and exploring phased withdrawals after retirement and early withdrawal under specific circumstances.

The industry’s pragmatic stance was semi-portability first — pushing for launch by mid-2012 so employees could reclaim partial autonomy. Full portability was the direction; semi-portability the first step. For current transfer arrangements, see the MPF education hub.

    Related articles

    Why Was Full MPF Portability So Hard?

    Why was “full portability” deemed difficult in November 2010? A...

    Lam calls MPF “unpopular with employees” as offsetting debate looms: can the core fund rebuild trust?

    A report from November 2017 captured the speeches at the Global Forum on...

    funds to compare