This article is a rewrite of a report from May 2012.
Ernst & Young, commissioned by Hong Kong’s insurance, investment funds and trustees associations, presented its MPF fee study at a May 2012 press conference. Covering the same study as companion reports, this version’s angle was the event itself: who said what.
| Speaker | Key point |
|---|---|
| The insurance federation’s immediate past chairman | Administration and direct expenses took the bulk at 1.17%; fund management fees were just 0.57%. Much room for fees to fall — an inevitable trend |
| The investment funds association chairman | Admin fees were within providers’ control; with unchanged structures, efficiency alone could bring total fees to 1.18% of assets by 2030 |
| The trustees association chairman | High admin fees stemmed from members not choosing funds and trustees not reaching economies of scale |
Hong Kong MPF’s average fee of 1.74 per cent of assets exceeded Australia, Chile, Singapore and the UK — whose pension assets were far larger.
Why so high? Three reasons: one, a young system with low contribution levels, too small for economies of scale; two, huge membership numbers driving administrative costs; three, many members ignoring their accounts for years, inflating per-head costs.
Efficiency gains and scale could bring management fees down — competition had already pushed some providers to cut fees in the past year. The next test was whether semi-portability would intensify competition and how far 1.74 per cent would fall.

This article is a rewrite of a report from August 2013. Hong Kong...

The Allianz Global Investors (RCM) chief executive said in November 2010...
Financial Secretary Paul Chan announces eMPF milestone: over 10 million MPF...