Economist warns universal pension would drag Hong Kong into “fiscal hell” of high taxes

As the opposition leverages budget disputes with “three conditions” — one being universal retirement protection — former CLSA chief economist Jim Walker has published “The cost of a universal pension”, warning it would put Hong Kong “on the road to fiscal hell, a high-tax European-style welfare state”. Even political veterans once open to studying the idea are now having second thoughts.

How does Walker do the maths?

Ageing is accelerating. Walker notes that by 2024, people aged 65-plus will be 21% of the population, surging to 28% by 2039; yet the working-age population (20–64) will grow just 2.7% between 2011 and 2039, while the 65-plus cohort jumps 165%.

The bill is astronomical. Paying every senior HK$1,000 a month would cost HK$20 billion in 2024, rising to about HK$30 billion by 2039 — though Walker questions whether HK$1,000 suffices. At HK$4,000 a month, the single outlay hits HK$40 billion in 2011, HK$81 billion in 2024 and over HK$119 billion in 2039; at HK$6,000, it’s HK$121.5 billion in 2024 and HK$179 billion in 2039.

Why would Hong Kong become a high-tax city?

No tax hikes, no money to pay. To fund a universal pension, Walker argues, the government would have no choice but to raise taxes: at HK$6,000 per senior per month, salaries tax would reach 27% and profits tax 28.5% by 2024; by 2039, 33.5% and 35% respectively. Beyond overloading taxpayers, side effects would include investor flight, returning elderly emigrants and surging medical costs. Plump fiscal reserves only treat symptoms — the mega-bill ultimately means higher taxes.

His conclusion: the numbers prove a universal pension is basically unworkable in Hong Kong; politicians writing blank cheques for votes would only march the city into a high-welfare, high-tax fiscal hell. With no natural resources, Hong Kong lives on free markets — if high taxes drive investors away, what future is left?

To understand today’s three-pillar retirement system, visit MPF fund comparison.