跳至主內容 Skip to main content

Donald Tsang: Universal Retirement Protection Unrealistic Short-Term — Better to Improve MPF

2011-05-25
Marcus Tang

Chief Executive Donald Tsang told a Q&A session he understands ageing concerns, but universal retirement protection lacks social consensus, with contributions and sustainability hotly disputed — forcing consensus for sweeping reform short-term is “unrealistic”; better to improve existing measures and review the MPF.

Tsang’s case

ArgumentDetail
Historical consensusThe MPF emerged when mainstream opinion rejected the old-age pension
No consensusUniversal protection means “everyone covered” and “pay-as-you-go” — society can’t agree
SustainabilityWith ageing, avoiding bankruptcy means tax rises plus forcing employers and workers to pay more

The pushback

Democrat Albert Ho: “unworkable” is groundless and exaggerated; society has tabled various models — the government should study, not dismiss; the old-age pension failed on sloppy colonial-era research, not comparable.

FTU’s Wong Kwok-kin: the government must at least start researching universal protection so society feels “more comfortable”; a short term left is no excuse — at minimum, “make a start”.

What’s happening now?

The government is reviewing the MPF system with the MPFA and boosting elderly welfare.

Is universal retirement protection just being stalled? Consensus won’t build itself — without starting research, the same lines will be repeated in ten years. Compare MPF funds’ fees and returns at MPF fund comparison.

    Related articles

    Lam calls MPF “unpopular with employees” as offsetting debate looms: can the core fund rebuild trust?

    A report from November 2017 captured the speeches at the Global Forum on...

    How Did the Central Policy Unit Study Retirement Protection?

    What did the CPU’s 2011 retirement research conclude? July 2011 LegCo...

    funds to compare