Chief Executive Donald Tsang told a Q&A session he understands ageing concerns, but universal retirement protection lacks social consensus, with contributions and sustainability hotly disputed — forcing consensus for sweeping reform short-term is “unrealistic”; better to improve existing measures and review the MPF.
| Argument | Detail |
|---|---|
| Historical consensus | The MPF emerged when mainstream opinion rejected the old-age pension |
| No consensus | Universal protection means “everyone covered” and “pay-as-you-go” — society can’t agree |
| Sustainability | With ageing, avoiding bankruptcy means tax rises plus forcing employers and workers to pay more |
Democrat Albert Ho: “unworkable” is groundless and exaggerated; society has tabled various models — the government should study, not dismiss; the old-age pension failed on sloppy colonial-era research, not comparable.
FTU’s Wong Kwok-kin: the government must at least start researching universal protection so society feels “more comfortable”; a short term left is no excuse — at minimum, “make a start”.
The government is reviewing the MPF system with the MPFA and boosting elderly welfare.
Is universal retirement protection just being stalled? Consensus won’t build itself — without starting research, the same lines will be repeated in ten years. Compare MPF funds’ fees and returns at MPF fund comparison.
A report from November 2017 captured the speeches at the Global Forum on...
In November 2017, a professor emeritus of social work and social...

What did the CPU’s 2011 retirement research conclude? July 2011 LegCo...