The MPFA is studying a hardship mechanism for early MPF withdrawals. HKU social work chair professor Chow Wing-sun told a radio programme it would deepen public negativity toward the MPF, urging the authority to scrap the consultation as “trying to run before walking”.
| Argument | Detail |
|---|---|
| The sums don’t work | Average balances are just HK$100,000–200,000 — too little for a home deposit or overseas study |
| Wrong priorities | The MPF already has deep problems, especially high admin fees; allowing early access means everyone grabs first, destroying retirement protection’s purpose |
| Wrong timing | “Running before walking” — the consultation wastes time; fix the system first |
Fellow guest Leung Siu-kay, HSBC Asia-Pacific strategy and economics adviser, said members who divert money mid-way and run short at retirement will draw on public welfare — unfair to members relying on MPF for old age.
Hardship access eases today’s pain, but MPF exists for retirement. Pain now versus pain decades later — does spending retirement money on today’s hardship help, or just defer the explosion? Chow’s answer is clear: fix the system first, consider hardship in the long run.
Retirement protection can’t run on “spending tomorrow’s money today”. Compare MPF funds’ fees and returns at MPF fund comparison.

How did Chow Wing-sun slam the 2011 compassionate withdrawal idea? In July...

The Government’s Line: HK$80,000 Single, HK$125,000 Couples The...
The Consultation Paper Tables Two Modelled Options After long deliberation,...