Eleven years in, MPF covers nearly 2.5 million employees and self-employed persons with assets topping HK$300 billion — yet public anger keeps rising over high fees and money locked up until 65. The MPFA plans to attack intermediary admin fees on two fronts: forcing fee disclosure with “reasonable level” benchmarks, and studying a non-profit public intermediary.
Average expense ratio 1.89%, with HK$6.5 billion a year in management fees. As of end-October 2010, the 458 MPF funds averaged a 1.89% expense ratio, down from 2.1% in January 2008 — but against a decade-average net return of 5.1% a year, the “rain or shine” fees still sting. The root cause: a not-fully-open market with weak competition; “semi-portability” comes no earlier than 2012.
Currently 65 at retirement; the MPFA is studying early-access relaxations. The regulator is reportedly considering letting members withdraw part of their balances early for doctor-certified serious illness, home purchase, or children’s overseas education. Critics warn early access would erode retirement protection and turn MPF into a welfare fund.
Its CPF takes 20% in contributions and offers far freer investment choice. After keeping a required sum in Singapore’s Central Provident Fund, members can freely buy approved stocks, funds, bonds, gold, life insurance — even use it for home purchases, helping push home ownership above 90%. Hong Kong’s rigid MPF looks poor by comparison.
See what you’re paying at MPF fund comparison.

In July 2011 the MPFA revealed it was studying two relaxations to MPF...

Why did a 2011 commentary oppose easing early MPF withdrawals? A 2011...
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury James Lau told the...