跳至主內容 Skip to main content

“Bogus Self-Employment”: Why a 2011 Warning About MPF and Injury Cover Still Matters

2011-12-20
Marcus Tang

A short news item from 20 December 2011 was not about returns at all, but about a growing employment practice of the time: employers cutting costs by requiring staff to work as “self-employed”. Many workers assumed buying their own accident insurance was enough. The head of the Association for the Rights of Industrial Accident Victims warned at the time: think again.

What was Hong Kong’s “bogus self-employment” controversy about?

Genuinely self-employed people must join an MPF scheme and contribute themselves — but “bogusly self-employed” workers lost even employee status: no employer contributions, and no protection under the Employment Ordinance. In 2011, labour advocates warned that self-bought accident insurance had limited coverage and could leave injured workers without adequate compensation; some employers even “promoted” staff to directors to strip them of injury protection.

What happened at the time

“Bogus self-employment” meant employers re-labelling employees as self-employed contractors — no more employer MPF contributions, no more employees’ compensation insurance. Under the Employment Ordinance, employees injured at work were protected — for example, up to four-fifths of wages during the first three years after a work injury — while the accident insurance a self-employed person could buy offered far narrower cover and payouts. As of December 2011, the Labour Department had received about 500 bogus self-employment claims in 25 months — clearly not an isolated problem.

Why it mattered then

“Bogus” self-employment was a double loss of protection: no employees’ compensation insurance for injuries, no employer MPF contributions for retirement. The advice given at the time was blunt: however urgently you need a job, understand the risks and your rights before signing — and check what the labour law says even when working for relatives or friends.

The lesson that stuck

The question that short item left behind still applies today: before signing any work contract, get clear on whether you are an employee or self-employed — that status decides whether you get employer MPF contributions and whether you are protected when injured at work. Self-employed contribution rules are explained at the MPF education hub.

    Related articles

    Hong Kong’s “work nomads”: how to consolidate ten MPF accounts

    This article is a rewrite of a report from August 2013. By Marcus Tang. The...

    Travel Insurance in China 2013: Three Policies, Three Different Jobs

    Adapted from a travel insurance guide published on July 2, 2013. In June...

    Replacing the MPF with a 7.5% central provident fund? Unpacking the proposal and the five-pillar debate

    In November 2017, a political party proposed a Central Provident Fund to...

    funds to compare