跳至主內容 Skip to main content

BOC-Prudential’s Tiered Fees: 0.15% Rebate for HK$1M-Plus Accounts

2012-10-15
Marcus Tang

This article is a rewrite of a report from October 2012.

With semi-portability nearing and some trustees quietly moving, fourth-ranked BOC-Prudential ruled out across-the-board cuts — opting for tiered fees instead: a 0.15% rebate for accounts above HK$1 million, 0.2% above HK$2 million.

Why tier MPF fees?

Big and small accounts cost the same to run — flat fees “rob the rich to pay the poor”. BOC-Prudential’s chief executive noted MPF assets kept swelling while balances varied wildly: over HK$70,000 per account on average, with individual clients above HK$5 million. Admin work barely differed by balance, so big accounts were far more cost-efficient; keeping tiny accounts was expensive. Flat fees had become anachronistic; tiering fixed the “rob-the-rich” distortion.

How did the industry read it?

Not a price cut — a rule rewrite. While rivals debated how much to cut before semi-portability, BOC-Prudential asked what was fair to charge. Rebating big accounts lowered fees in effect, while signalling that charges should reflect costs, not one-size-fits-all.

What is the lesson from 2012?

The fee war had more than one playbook. BOC-Prudential’s 2012 tiering was the second road beside outright cuts: not lower for all, but rebates by account size. For members comparing fees, the percentage is not the whole story — ask which tier your account sits in.

    Related articles

    How Did HSBC and Hang Seng Cut MPF Fees in 2011?

    How big were HSBC and Hang Seng’s 2011 cuts? From March 2011, HSBC and...

    How one MPF member turned 17 years of contributions into HK$1 million — a club of 0.3 per cent

    A newspaper columnist noted an extraordinary case: a member who started work...

    How Did HSBC Slash MPF Fees in 2011?

    How big was HSBC’s 2011 fee cut? In February 2011, HSBC cut management...

    funds to compare