This article is a rewrite of a report from February 2012.
Semi-portability is about to let members choose their own Hong Kong equity funds. Which one to pick — and is a bull-market record enough? The 2012 data says no: bear markets are the real test.
A five-year review found beating the market was easy for fund managers in rallies, but in downturns stock-picking was truly tested — only about 30% of Hong Kong equity funds outperformed. Members should study each fund’s record in both rising and falling markets to judge a manager’s real stock-picking skill and find the more reliable options, not just chase bull-market numbers.
| Fund | Year | Return |
|---|---|---|
| Haitong MPF Retirement Fund – Haitong Hong Kong SAR Fund – A | 2007 | +99.2% (vs +50.46% sector average) |
| Sun Life Rainbow MPF Scheme – Sun Life First State MPF Hong Kong Equity Fund – B | 2009 | +74.67% |
| Same fund | 2010 | +24.65% |
| Same fund | 2011 | -10.76% |
The Haitong Hong Kong SAR Fund surged 99.2% in 2007, the year’s best performer against a 50.46% sector average; the Sun Life First State Hong Kong Equity Fund then dominated 2009–2011 with +74.67%, +24.65% and -10.76%. (Figures as of February 2012.) The right pick could be very rewarding.
Check whether the fund has recently changed managers — a new manager can alter the investment approach, strategy and stock-picking ability, making past returns unreliable. With semi-portability widening choice, homework matters more than ever: compare MPF funds’ fees and performance rather than following the crowd.

When MPF launched, fund choices were few and a batch of “star...
In 2017, the 49 Hong Kong equity MPF funds averaged a return of nearly 40...

This article is a rewrite of a report from August 2013. With 550 MPF funds...