跳至主內容 Skip to main content

A self-owned flat plus MPF won’t sustain pre-retirement living standards; reverse mortgages paying ~HK$11,000 a month are worth a look

2011-08-25
Marcus Tang

Many workers assume that owning a self-occupied flat plus MPF means retirement is “all sorted.” That thinking deserves scrutiny.

Why might a flat plus MPF fall short?

Assume MPF returns merely match inflation, then ask: can three years of working savings (about 10% monthly savings rate) fund one year of spending? If not, pre-retirement living standards can’t be maintained. Most people work nearly 40 years then fund nearly 20 years of retirement spending; for a comfortable retirement beyond a flat and MPF, extra investing is needed — either spend less, find other means, or hope MPF returns far outpace inflation.

How does a reverse mortgage work as an option?

The Mortgage Corporation disclosed approved reverse-mortgage borrowers average 69 years old, with properties averaging 30 years old worth HK$3.7 million, drawing average monthly annuities of about HK$11,000. The scheme lets elderly owners keep a roof over their heads plus steady income — one retirement option among several; whether the annuity suffices depends on lifestyle expectations and other savings.

How should workers plan retirement holistically?

Don’t bet retirement solely on property and MPF — prepare on multiple fronts early: review your MPF fund mix and use retirement-planning education to weigh each option’s pros and cons.

    Related articles

    280-times oversubscribed, white-form odds of 87 to 1: the numbers behind Hong Kong’s youth housing crisis

    A youth housing opinion survey put it bluntly: 89 per cent of young people...

    Conservative Funds Return at Most 1.2% a Year — All Trailing 1.8% Inflation

    Parking MPF money in the “safest” option — conservative funds or...

    funds to compare